Tips of the critical reader

Checklist for the Critical Reader

An approach suggested by Elmes, Kantowitz, Roediger III, (2003) to generate some ideas.  As you read the empirical study, start asking

Introduction

  • What is the author’s goal; Identify theory? Is there a competing theory?
  • What are the hypothesis to be tested?  How would I test these hypothesis?

Method

  • How would I do the study? Is my proposed method better that the author’s
  • Does the author’s method actually test the hypothesis?
  • What are the independent, dependent and control variables?  How would I measure these variables?  Is there a better way?
  • Using the participants, apparatus, materials, and procedures described by the author, what results would I predict for this experiment?

Results

  • Did the author get unexpected results?
  • How would I interpret these result? (e.g., applications, implications and/or alternative explanations)

Discussion

  • Does my interpretation or the author’s best represent the data?  If I have a better interpretation, how would I test my interpretation?
  • What questions are left unanswered?
  • What additional studies are left unanswered?

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s